Windows Phone was once the dominant operating system on mobile phones. The scales weighed heavily on the giant beasts and were used by the most powerful handsets.
But it was not long before Windows dropped out of the scene!
Windows Phone could now be a staunch rival to Google’s Android and Apple’s Apple ; perhaps if it had lessened its mistakes, Microsoft would now be a serious challenge for other tech giants in the mobile operating system. The truth is that Microsoft’s dominance of desktop and laptop windows has never been transferred to Windows Mobile.
After the defeat of Windows Phone, the Red Wings didn’t even want to talk about its reasons. For someone with a technology background, it may not be difficult to figure out the reasons for Windows Phone failure. It is enough to put the existing puzzles together.
Yes! Windows Phone Man! But perhaps magnificent – perhaps impressive – in fact it was the Peshmerga operating system that was to be sacrificed. Let’s turn history a little bit. Rest assured, you will eventually find that Windows Phone is dead atrocious and may take some time again!
October 1: Different operating systems
October 11, 2009 Stephen Young, a technology-savvy teenager, stands proudly in front of an audience and eagerly approves the release of a new version of the mobile operating system. Fry had good reasons for passion, since the original Windows Phone was different nowadays and in many ways ahead of its time.
WP7’s unique interface and live tiles provided live information while the iPhone had static icons at the time. Calendars included these live tiles to set and manage appointments, a very smooth messaging program, and a phone app.
Such a feature was neither available on Android nor iOS.
On the other hand, some of the design inspiration for apps like HTC BlinkFeed or / tag / google-now / cards was inspired by Microsoft’s Windows Phone information and text; at least Microsoft thought so.
Perhaps Microsoft’s biggest mistake was failing to follow its bold view of sensitivity in its new design. In fact, Windows Phone was compromised when Microsoft realized through feedback that the new design and operating system were too foreign to users.
The speed and responsiveness of Windows Phone were far superior to that of Android. The physical keyboard of the Windows Phone handsets was highly functional and superior. Microsoft’s locksmith notifications were very efficient and effective. In many of the most important tasks, Windows Phone equaled iOS; in fact, Microsoft took an approach similar to that of Apple.
He intended to own and control his own hardware and software. However, the hardware of the Windows Phone was not made by Microsoft. The Microsoft software store was too closed to be tolerated. Maybe if Microsoft had taken Google’s approach to Android, now Windows Phone had something to say.
November 7: Revolution in Industrial Design
The contribution of the Windows Phone ecosystem to smartphone design has never been properly recognized. This platform introduces handsets such as Samsung Omnia 7 with 5-inch OLED display , handset The Dell Venue Pro with a slide-out keyboard and HTC 7 Surround with a large, integrated speaker had a stormy start. The following year, when HTC introduced the Windows Phone 8X and 8S and the Nokia Lumia 800 , we saw a revolution in industrial design by Windows Phone.
The smartphones used the funniest and most innovative designs of their time. Adapted from the beautiful design of the N9 in the form of pillows and icons, Nokia has stolen a Windows Phone for literally! But it didn’t matter – the reality was something else – that by the end of the year, they had the best hardware for a few mornings. The iPhone 4S looked good at the time.
But it suffered from duplicate design last year and had a smaller screen.
Microsoft has been able to launch Windows Phone 8 with different designs from the global handset makers, and one year later it continues with the best designs from Nokia and HTC. Nokia gambled all its future on Windows; HTC, on the other hand, invested heavily in the development of Windows Phone devices such as the 8X and 8S (provided they had Windows Phone signatures on them). This was a pivotal moment for the entire mobile operating system, as the failure of Windows Phone to infiltrate the iPhone and Android market was what led to the loss of trust of Microsoft companies and hardware partners, and ultimately the dissolution of Nokia as a mobile phone maker.
July 6: One step ahead in mobile cameras
As Windows Phone launches, user perceptions of the user interface have changed. On the one hand, the hardware was excellent. Before its death, the operating system was able to sabotage all the cameras in the smartphone world by offering powerful camera technologies. The Lumia 1020 can be mentioned here. The Lumia 2 was a Windows version of the Nokia PureView 808 that came with Symbian OS. Both phones feature a 2-megapixel sensor, and both have made significant strides in mobile imaging. The Nokia PureView 808 still fits well with the current standards of the mobile camera world.
Windows Phone had a number of weaknesses that greatly diminished its chances of success, but in terms of powerful hardware, great design, professional cameras, and reliable battery life it was never in doubt.
August 2013: YouTube Blockage
the main answer lies in the severe failure of this operating system to attract third-party developers. Every time Nokia launched a new device with the Windows Phone platform, it had to avoid the question of when the Instagram app would launch for the operating system. Even when Microsoft blamed the company for delivering third-party software, Google, along with the ecosystem interested in acquiring the necessary applications, easily won.
Elsewhere, where Microsoft’s Bing was superior to Google’s search engine, Hotmail was still popular with users, and Internet Explorer was still the dominant browser, so there was a chance we could talk about Android’s crash.
Perhaps YouTube ‘s biggest missing program was YouTube , and that wasn’t a coincidence. There is a long history of antagonism between Google and Microsoft over YouTube in Windows Phone, but ultimately it can be thought that Google did not want to give Windows Phone the chance to become a bitter rival of Android.
Most internet usage statistics are recorded by mobile phones, and YouTube’s presence and use on mobile phones takes up a large portion of the user’s time. So any platform that has lost a powerful program like YouTube has its disadvantages. This analysis may seem simplistic to the reader.
But there are similar reasons behind Google’s decision not to support YouTube in the Amazon Echo Show . This could be another example of trying to remove another competitor (this time for Google Home) by removing YouTube.
April 7: Nokia takeover
By year 7, Windows Phone had all the good news in its purse and became a lesson to Microsoft and the mobile industry. Microsoft bought the Finnish mobile phone maker by abandoning two mobile giants, HTC and Samsung. What Microsoft was looking for was brand change and positioning. For this reason, the first move of the Microsoft logo on modern smartphones was played.
But the Red Wings couldn’t change the path that had been missed by the lack of apps. It was only trying to get ahead with the traditional camera and Nokia’s strengths. What happened was that manufacturers and retailers like Samsung realized the importance of these factors and eventually outlasted Nokia in this simple game.
One of the important things that Microsoft had to consider before buying Nokia was the inconsistency of priorities.
Microsoft saw the iPhone in its path.
Nokia, meanwhile, wanted to make Windows Phone more optimistic and less expensive.
Nokia also initially intended to seize markets and invest in India’s developing regions and part of the Asian subcontinent. While all of Microsoft’s thinking was against its oldest competitor. The frustration on both sides of the progress made their failure predictable, given their different goals.
Microsoft’s lesson for companies like Google, which recently acquired the HTC design team, has several different dimensions. First, adopting an Apple-like approach, such as user interface control, has made Windows Phone a seamless operating system. Second, if software development giants are frustrated by their hardware partners, they may suddenly be on the decline. Microsoft’s goal was to have Nokia as a designer and maker of Windows Phone hardware, while still wanting Samsung and HTC to pay for Windows Phone handsets. It was a greedy move.
If Nokia were to buy earlier and consider a unified strategy for Windows Phone, it could have saved the operating system from many headaches and even failures. Defeating two high-end iOS and lower-level Android OS has always been an irrational and ambitious goal for Microsoft.
Aug. 2: 0.9% stake
What happened after Microsoft’s three-year acquisition of Nokia? In year 4, the smartphone market came to a complete standstill and was split between the iPhone and Android. According to Gartner’s data, 4.3 percent of all mobile phones sold use Android and iOS. At that time, Microsoft accounted for only 4.7 percent of the market, and was steadily falling. The reality was that thanks to enough resources, Microsoft was able to keep Windows Phone alive for a while.